HX Expeditions

HX Expeditions is one of the easiest expedition brands to misunderstand. It is no longer simply the adventurous arm of Hurtigruten. HX now operates as a separate expedition business, while Hurtigruten concentrates on Norwegian coastal voyages. That distinction matters because HX should be compared with expedition operators such as PONANT, Silversea Expeditions and Seabourn Expedition, not with a conventional Norwegian coastal ferry-cruise product.

The strongest reason to book HX is not the ship itself. It is the combination of included expedition activity, serious onboard learning and comfortable Scandinavian ships. The brand works particularly well for travellers who want to come back from a landing wet, cold and full of questions, then have a sauna, a good dinner and a glass of wine without feeling that every part of the day has generated another charge.

CruisePing verdict

HX is strongest when you want a real expedition rather than a themed cruise. I would choose it for Antarctica, Greenland, the Northwest Passage or Alaska when the itinerary and Expedition Team matter more than evening entertainment. The two hybrid ships offer the best onboard comfort; MS Fram is the more convincing choice when smaller scale matters. If you mainly want luxury service, formal dining or a predictable port schedule, another line will fit better.

HX Expeditions at a glance

Cruise style Premium expedition cruising with a strong science, wildlife and activity focus rather than conventional resort-ship entertainment
Current fleet 5 ships: MS Roald Amundsen, MS Fridtjof Nansen, MS Fram, MS Spitsbergen and MS Santa Cruz II
Typical ship scale 90 to 490 guests, with the two hybrid ships at the top of the range and Santa Cruz II at the smallest end
Main regions Antarctica, Greenland, Svalbard, Northwest Passage, Arctic Canada, Alaska, South America, Galápagos, Iceland, Norway and selected British Isles voyages
UK departures Limited rather than a core UK-homeport programme; many expeditions use overseas embarkation ports or connecting-flight arrangements
Passenger profile Curious, destination-led travellers who value wildlife, geology, history, photography and guided activity more than nightlife
Children / age policy Children are welcome; child fares cover ages 2-15. Antarctica and Galápagos have a minimum age of 5, and participation under 12 in small-boat landings is at the captain’s discretion
Fare position Premium expedition pricing with a broad all-inclusive structure; compare expedition content and logistics, not just cabin price
Gratuities Included; no discretionary service charge is added
Drinks Most drinks are included throughout the day and evening; selected premium drinks cost extra
Wi-Fi Included, but satellite coverage and speed can be limited in remote expedition regions
Dining style Relaxed Scandinavian-influenced dining; the larger ships add Lindstrøm fine dining and more casual alternatives
Dress / formality Casual and practical, including at dinner; expedition clothing matters far more than formalwear
Solo travel Solo supplement normally applies but selected departures are sold without it; availability changes by sailing
Best known for Expert-led landings, Science Centres, polar and remote-region itineraries, and a more inclusive expedition fare than many competitors
Main compromise The expedition programme drives the day. Entertainment is low-key, itineraries can change with conditions, and the two 490-guest ships are not especially intimate by expedition standards

Best suited to

  • Wildlife and landscape travellers who want guided landings rather than sightseeing from the ship
  • People who enjoy lectures, citizen science, photography and talking to specialists
  • Travellers who want drinks, Wi-Fi, gratuities and core expedition activity wrapped into the fare
  • Guests who like Scandinavian design and practical comfort without formal dress

Think carefully if

  • Anyone whose holiday depends on fixed port times and a guaranteed published itinerary
  • Travellers who want theatre productions, casinos, extensive shopping or late-night entertainment
  • People who equate expedition cruising with fewer than 200 guests on every ship
  • Guests who will be disappointed if weather or wildlife changes the plan

HX and Hurtigruten are now different choices

The name history still causes confusion. HX grew out of Hurtigruten’s expedition operation, but the two products now sit apart. HX’s explanation of the separation is useful because it makes the booking distinction clear: Hurtigruten is the Norwegian coastal specialist, while HX is the global expedition business. CruisePing treats them as separate cruise lines for exactly that reason.

If you want scheduled coastal calls, short port-to-port sectors and Norwegian transport heritage, wait for our Hurtigruten guide. HX is for voyages where landing sites, wildlife, ice, sea conditions and the Expedition Team can determine what happens next. That flexibility is a feature when you want exploration and a frustration when you want a conventional cruise timetable.

The five-ship fleet is more varied than it first appears

The five-ship HX fleet splits into three useful groups. MS Roald Amundsen and MS Fridtjof Nansen are the 490-guest hybrid sisters, with balconies, three restaurants, large Science Centres, infinity pools, hot tubs and the broadest resort-style facilities in the fleet. MS Fram is a 200-guest purpose-built expedition ship, recently refreshed and much more intimate. MS Spitsbergen is smaller again at 150 guests, while 90-guest MS Santa Cruz II is a specialist Galápagos ship rather than a general-purpose polar vessel.

I would not rank those five from newest to oldest. The best ship depends on what the itinerary needs. A balcony, infinity pool and 490-guest scale are attractive on a long Antarctic crossing, but a smaller ship can feel more coherent when the whole reason for travelling is to get ashore quickly and repeatedly. The HX ship selector makes that trade-off explicit.

What the all-inclusive fare really buys

HX’s inclusions are a significant strength. The fare normally covers breakfast, lunch and dinner, drinks during the day and evening apart from selected premium choices, Wi-Fi, gratuities, the onboard Science Centre and the core daily expedition programme. HX practical information should still be checked for your sailing because regional rules, optional excursions and pre- or post-cruise arrangements can vary.

The useful comparison is not with a mainstream cruise fare that excludes excursions. On a serious expedition, the landing programme is central to the product. When a Zodiac outing, hike, lecture programme, waterproof boots in relevant destinations and expert interpretation are built into the experience, the headline fare becomes more meaningful. Premium excursions, spa treatments, shop purchases and some specialist activities can still add cost.

Expedition days are the point of the holiday

A typical HX day may involve an early landing briefing, a small-boat transfer, a guided walk or wildlife session, time back on board for lunch, then another landing, scenic cruise or lecture. The plan can move. Ice, swell, wind, wildlife and local permissions matter more than the timetable printed months earlier. Travellers who enjoy that uncertainty tend to love expedition cruising; travellers who need certainty can find it stressful.

The Science Centre is not decorative branding. On the main expedition ships it functions as a working hub for the Expedition Team, lectures, microscopes, samples, workshops and citizen-science activity. The best HX passengers use it. If you have no interest in understanding where you are, you are paying for a large part of the product without taking advantage of it.

Dining is better than the old expedition stereotype

MS Roald Amundsen and MS Fridtjof Nansen have three useful dining personalities: Aune as the main restaurant, Fredheim for casual food and takeaway, and Lindstrøm as the more refined option. Suite guests receive broader Lindstrøm access, while other guests can usually reserve it for an extra charge. MS Fram has Aune and Lindstrøm plus an outdoor BBQ rather than the same three-restaurant arrangement.

The style remains relaxed. You do not need evening jackets or formal dresses after a day ashore. That is exactly right for the product. I would rather HX spend space on observation, science and expedition logistics than on a formal dining room that forces everyone to change clothes for two hours.

Cabins: do not assume expedition means basic

The two hybrid ships have 265 outside cabins and suites each, with roughly half offering balconies. Some of the top aft suites add private outdoor hot tubs. That makes them unusually comfortable expedition platforms, but it also explains the higher guest count. A balcony can be excellent in Greenland or Antarctica when wildlife or ice appears unexpectedly, although exposed weather may reduce how often you actually sit outside.

MS Fram offers a more traditional mix that includes inside cabins as well as outside rooms and suites. Its 2025 refurbishment is important because it reduces the age gap in the areas that passengers actually use. For value, I would rather take a well-positioned outside cabin on the better itinerary than stretch to a suite and compromise the route.

Wellness facilities are useful, not the main event

All HX expedition ships offer places to warm up and recover after active days. The hybrid sisters are strongest, with fitness and wellness facilities, sauna, hot tubs and an infinity pool. Fram has a gym, sauna and outdoor hot tubs. These are not destination substitutes; they are excellent recovery spaces when you have spent hours in cold wind or waterproof gear.

The ships do not become resort ships because they have pools. On polar itineraries the most valuable public area is often the one with the best sightline to a whale, glacier or seabird. Keep that priority in mind when comparing glossy deck plans.

Families need to read the expedition rules, not just the child fare

HX welcomes children and offers discounted child pricing, but there is no conventional children’s club proposition across these ships. Antarctica and the Galápagos have a minimum age of five, and participation by children under 12 in small-boat landings is decided by the captain. Those rules are more important than whether a cabin can technically sleep three or four.

I would take an older, genuinely nature-obsessed child on the right HX itinerary. I would not choose HX as a substitute for a family resort cruise. Long lectures, rough-water transfers, early starts and weather changes are part of the experience, and the ship is not designed to entertain children who decide they are bored with wildlife.

Solo travel can be excellent when the supplement disappears

Expedition cruising is naturally social because the same people repeatedly share landings, briefings and meals. HX periodically removes the solo supplement from selected departures. That can transform value, especially on a premium polar voyage where the normal single-person penalty is substantial.

The important word is selected. Do not assume a no-supplement promotion applies to your preferred ship, cabin or included hotel nights. Compare the actual single price, not the percentage headline. A strong no-supplement Fram sailing can be better value than a discounted hybrid-ship cabin even if the advertised saving looks smaller.

Accessibility requires two separate decisions

Accessible cabins exist on the fleet, including wheelchair-accessible categories on the hybrid sisters and MS Fram. Shipboard accessibility is only half the question. Expedition boats, wet landings, snow, uneven rock and remote piers can make the shore programme substantially harder than moving around the vessel.

Anyone with limited mobility should discuss both the cabin and the planned activities before paying a deposit. A comfortable accessible room does not guarantee that every landing is practical. Equally, missing one difficult landing does not automatically make the whole expedition poor value if scenic cruising, lectures and easier shore calls remain strong.

Where HX makes the strongest case

Antarctica is the obvious flagship, but I would not reduce HX to Antarctica. Greenland and the Northwest Passage suit the company’s combination of polar hardware, expedition staff and science. Alaska can be particularly interesting on MS Fridtjof Nansen because the product focuses more strongly on wilderness and natural history than a conventional Inside Passage cruise. MS Santa Cruz II gives HX a completely different Galápagos proposition at only 90 guests.

The British Isles programme is worth noticing for UK travellers because it can remove long-haul travel from the equation, but HX is not a reliable year-round UK-homeport line. For most of the fleet, flights and remote embarkation logistics remain part of the purchase. Price the whole journey, including hotels, transfers, insurance and any connecting-flight arrangements.

Where I would start

For a first HX expedition, I would normally start with MS Roald Amundsen or MS Fridtjof Nansen. They are the easiest bridge from conventional premium cruising because the expedition programme sits inside a genuinely comfortable modern ship. If smaller scale matters more than balconies, a pool and three dining concepts, MS Fram is the more interesting alternative.

MS Spitsbergen belongs on a shortlist for travellers deliberately seeking a very small Arctic ship, while MS Santa Cruz II is the obvious Galápagos choice because that is its specialist role. I would not rank all five in a single league table here. The full HX ship selector does that job properly by comparing route, scale, cabins and onboard facilities.

If the same Antarctica itinerary appeared on Roald Amundsen and Fridtjof Nansen at the same price, I would choose the better cabin position or departure date rather than pretend one sister is inherently superior. If Fram offered a similarly strong route at a meaningful saving, I would seriously consider Fram because 200 guests is a real difference.

Related CruisePing guides

Useful official links